Home → Questions →

How can I get access to the query string? or how could I do pagination?

Torey Heinz

15 Oct, 2010 08:16 AM via web

Admin Functions

• Edit
• Remove

How can I get access to the query string? or how could I do pagination?

1. 2 Posted by John Nunemaker on 15 Oct, 2010 04:06 PM

   

   Currently there is no way to paginate. What are you needing to do?

   On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Torey Heinz <
   ***@tenderapp.com<tender%***@tenderapp.com>
   > wrote:

   Admin Functions

   • Edit
   • Split
   • Remove

2. 3 Posted by Torey Heinz on 15 Oct, 2010 07:06 PM

   

   This is what I would like to do
   http://commhomesales.com/homes-for-sale/logan-estates/?page=3
   

   {{ item.data.per_page | times: item.params[:page] | assign_to: 'offset'}}
   {% for home in item.children limit: item.data.per_page offset: offset %}
     {% include 'home_intro' for home %}
   {% endfor %}

   But obviously what I don't have is anything like item.params

   If there where some way you could expose rack.request.query_hash I think I could do pagination.

   I am actually think about creating a 'folder' under logan-estates called page, and then creating like 10 pages under that, so could grab {{ item.path | split | last }}
   

   Admin Functions

   • Edit
   • Split
   • Remove

3. 4 Posted by John Nunemaker on 17 Oct, 2010 09:54 PM

   

   The link did not work for me. It sounds like you maybe need a little more
   flexibility than we currently have. You want to be able to store homes and
   then paginate through them, correct? Currently with pages it is all or
   nothing.

   The way you are wanting to do it now will not work even we exposed the
   params to you as the page caching we employ does not work with query
   strings.

   We definitely want to support this type of use case, right now you will have
   to work around it though by doing JavaScript pagination or none at all.

   On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Torey Heinz <
   ***@tenderapp.com<tender%***@tenderapp.com>
   > wrote:

   Admin Functions

   • Edit
   • Split
   • Remove

4. 5 Posted by Torey Heinz on 17 Oct, 2010 10:05 PM

   

   Ah, I forgot about page caching.

   The link wasn't real sorry about the confusion.

   No worries, we'll work around it.

   The thrill of image re-sizing is enough to make me overlook this minor
   issue.

   On Oct 17, 2010 5:59 PM, "John Nunemaker" <
   ***@tenderapp.com<tender%***@tenderapp.com>>
   wrote:

   Admin Functions

   • Edit
   • Split
   • Remove

5. 6 Posted by John Nunemaker on 17 Oct, 2010 10:47 PM

   

   Ha! Glad to hear you are excited about it.

   Admin Functions

   • Edit
   • Split
   • Remove

6. Steve Smith closed this discussion on 16 Nov, 2010 02:51 PM.

Comments are currently closed for this discussion. You can start a new one.